Reterra Boost is the listings-and-CRM half of the Reterra platform: it brings the property listing engine, the customer relationship record and digital contracting into one place so a sales team moves from enquiry to signed contract without re-keying anything. That is a specific shape of problem. This page is about whether it is your shape.
You sell or lease property in Saudi Arabia, your pipeline currently lives across a spreadsheet, a messaging app and a filing cabinet, and the gap that costs you deals is the one between "interested" and "signed". If your listings and your customer record are maintained twice by two teams, the single-record model is the point of the product, and it pays back quickly.
We do not recommend it when property sales are not the core of what you run. If your priority is resident experience, facilities and community operations rather than the sales pipeline, a listings-and-CRM tool is the wrong entry point. If your requirement is a general commercial CRM across several unrelated business lines, look at general-purpose platforms on our CRM & contact centre page instead — a real-estate-shaped CRM will fight you everywhere your business is not real estate.
Per Reterra's own published material, Boost unifies three things that are usually three systems: the property listing engine, the CRM record behind each lead, and digital contracting, so a team can go from lead to contract in one flow. Boost sits alongside the rest of the Reterra family — resident experience, analytics and smart check-in — which is why a Boost decision is rarely only a Boost decision.
Two worth naming before you sign. First, scope: Boost is built for property sales and leasing, so every requirement outside that line needs either another module or another system, and the integration cost belongs in the business case from day one. Second, data: a listings-and-CRM platform is only as good as the property and contact data you migrate into it, and duplicate or half-complete records are the most common reason a rollout stalls in month two.
Property transactions in the Kingdom generate tax obligations, and a system that issues contracts sits close to the systems that issue invoices. VAT at 15% applies to the supplies it touches, and ZATCA's e-invoicing rules govern how those invoices are produced and reported. The practical question at selection time is not "is the product compliant" but "where does the compliant invoice get issued, and does this platform hand it the right data". We answer that in writing before anyone signs. Sector context is on our real estate page.
We publish no price here, because a licence figure on a web page is out of date the week it is written and tells you nothing about your own total. The number that matters is three years, and it has four parts: licences, the migration of your property and contact data, the integrations to finance and to whatever issues your invoices, and the internal time your team spends in the first two quarters. We build that model with your figures, and we show you the arithmetic.
The real comparison is not feature grids, it is fit: a general CRM configured for property versus a platform built for it. The first is flexible and cheap to start and expensive to keep aligned; the second is opinionated and fast where it fits and awkward where it does not. Our software comparisons put candidates side by side on the criteria that actually decide these projects.
We start with your operation — portfolio shape, sales model, team size, the systems already in place — and score the requirement before anyone demonstrates anything. A demo booked before the requirement is written is a demo that writes the requirement for you.
Listings and CRM never live alone: finance, invoicing, the website that publishes the listings and whatever your agents already use on the phone all attach to it. We map every one of those interfaces first and sequence the rollout around them, because integrations, not screens, are where property-system cutovers fail.
Agents and sales managers are trained on their own pipeline data before cutover, not on a sample dataset, and the first weeks of live trading run with support on call. Adoption is the deliverable; a configured system nobody uses is a cost, not a capability.
We publish no counters or percentages on this page — a figure a reader cannot verify is decoration. What we will say about outcomes is structural: the teams that get value are the ones that cleaned their property and contact data before migration and gave one person ownership of the pipeline definition. Ask us for references in your part of the market and we will arrange direct conversations.
We do not quote a duration before we have seen the estate. The variables that decide it are portfolio size, how clean the existing property and contact data is, and how many finance and invoicing interfaces have to be built. All three are measured in the assessment, and the timeline is written down before work starts.
Licences, data migration, integrations, training and the internal time of the people running the change. Section 4 sets out how we model it; the figures are yours, not a published average.
Compliance posture is configuration-specific and version-specific, so we verify it against your deployment rather than repeat a claim. The obligations in scope for a property platform are VAT at 15% on the supplies it touches, ZATCA's e-invoicing rules wherever it feeds invoicing, and the national data-protection regime for personal data. Clause-level currency belongs to the regulators and to your compliance function.
Whichever ones fit your requirement — typically a general-purpose CRM configured for property, and at least one other vertical platform. The published starting point is our comparisons; the shortlist itself depends on your portfolio and sales model.
That is normally the whole design: finance, invoicing and the public website usually stay, and Boost becomes the system of record for listings and pipeline. What has to be agreed up front is which system owns which field, because two systems that both believe they own the customer record will diverge within a quarter.
The honest version of this heading is that no number belongs on it. A count of projects on a product page cannot be checked by the reader and cannot be kept current by the page. What can be checked is who and what — available in reference calls, arranged on request.
We name organizations only with their consent, and in conversation rather than in prose. References relevant to your portfolio type are provided on request.
Presented attributably in a first conversation — scope, duration, what actually changed. No unattributed outcome claim appears here, because an unattributed outcome claim is worth nothing to a buyer.
We publish no testimonial quotations on this page. A quotation you cannot question is advertising; a reference call you can question is evidence. We arrange the second.
Reterra Boost is a Reterra product and we implement and support it directly, so read this page as the position of the team that would do the work rather than as an arm's-length comparison. Our selection and integration method is set out on the consulting page, and where a genuinely independent view is what you need, section 1.2 above says so plainly.
Continue with CRM & contact centre for the general-purpose alternatives, real estate for the sector picture, or our software comparisons.
Bring your portfolio shape, your current pipeline process and the systems you intend to keep. You will leave with a written fit verdict and the integration map behind it, whether or not the answer is Boost. Book a session or ask for a scoped assessment.
Unlimited support included.
One-on-one onboarding sessions.
Training videos, webinars, & demos.