IoT projects are easy to demo and hard to run. A sensor on a dashboard takes a week; a fleet of connected assets feeding decisions your operations team actually trusts - with the OT network secured and the data owned - is an engineering and governance programme. IoT solutions for Saudi Arabia have to be designed from that second picture, which is why we begin with feasibility, not with hardware.
We advise and deliver as an independent party across connected assets, condition monitoring and OT/IT integration, with security treated as a design input rather than an afterthought.
Assets fail and you find out afterwards. Utilisation, temperature, location or energy data is collected manually or not at all. Maintenance is scheduled by calendar rather than by condition. Plant systems and business systems disagree about what happened on the floor. These are the situations where instrumenting the physical operation pays for itself.
If the process is not stable enough for its data to mean anything, fix the process first. If one report from an existing SCADA or BMS answers the question, you need integration, not new sensors. And if there is no one to act on an alert, more alerts will not help. A feasibility consultation exists to say this before the hardware is bought, not after.
Which operational decision should change because an asset is connected - maintain now versus later, dispatch here versus there, run versus stop? That decision, its owner and its value are written down first.
Feasibility across connectivity (coverage, protocols, power), data (volumes, latency, residency), security (network segmentation, device identity, OT exposure) and economics. Platform and hardware options are scored against agreed criteria - we hold no stock and take no side.
A written architecture and rollout recommendation with alternatives and reasons, including the honest option of a smaller pilot than the vendor proposed - or none.
Device onboarding, network and platform build, and the integration that makes the data land where decisions are made - maintenance systems, ERP, dashboards - rather than in a silo. OT changes are sequenced with operations so production is not put at risk for telemetry.
Fleets grow, firmware ages, and the threat picture moves. We stay engaged on scaling, security posture and whether the data is still changing the decisions it was installed to change.
An IoT feasibility assessment; a security-first reference architecture for your sites; a costed rollout plan by phase; the delivered pilot or production fleet with its integrations; and handover documentation your own team can operate from.
Set by site conditions, connectivity and how many systems the data must reach - so the honest artefact is the dated plan you receive at feasibility, per site and per phase, not a published average that fits nobody.
Fixed-scope feasibility, phase-gated delivery, and an operate-and-advise retainer. We do not publish prices: hardware mix, site count and integration depth move the number by multiples, and a figure detached from that scope would only mislead. Pricing follows the written scope, and each phase can stand alone.
Operators of physical assets in Saudi Arabia: manufacturing plants instrumenting lines and utilities, logistics and facilities operators tracking fleets and environments, and telecom players building or reselling connectivity-led propositions. If your margin lives in uptime, energy or asset utilisation, this is for you.
Published results are attributable results: named client, defined baseline, written consent. We do not publish anonymous percentages. Named references matched to your sector are offered during evaluation, with consent.
Per-site conditions dominate: existing connectivity, device access, OT change windows and how many downstream systems consume the data. Feasibility produces a dated, per-phase plan for your sites - that is the real answer.
Over three years the platform licence is rarely the biggest line: devices and installation, connectivity fees, integration and the operating effort of monitoring and firmware management usually outweigh it. Our recommendation lays out that TCO structure for your shortlisted options so you compare like-for-like.
The design maps your obligations before build: where telemetry may be stored and processed, how personal data in the stream is protected, and the cybersecurity controls your supervising authority expects for operational technology. Formal positions are taken with the competent authority by name during design, not asserted generically on a web page.
Alternatives are part of the deliverable: using data from systems you already run, a narrower pilot, a different connectivity model, or waiting. Each is recorded with the reason it was or was not chosen.
Integration is the point - telemetry that never reaches your maintenance system or ERP changes nothing. Existing SCADA, historians and business systems are treated as sources and consumers to connect, not as things to replace.
Exactly because the heading says numbers, we hold the bar: a number appears here only when a named client has consented to stand behind it, with its baseline stated. None are published today; the discipline is the point, and invented precision would break it.
We do not name clients without written agreement. Sector-relevant named references are provided during evaluation, with consent.
Case material is shared under the same rule - by name, during evaluation, with consent. For manufacturing-floor scope specifically, see the platform note in section 12.
Testimonials appear only when a real client has written and approved one. None are invented in the meantime.
Partnerships are published and maintained on the partners page - the single source of truth, so nothing here can go stale silently. On the factory side, FactoryOnline is the shop-floor platform in our portfolio that IoT programmes most often connect to.
Manufacturing - the sector where condition monitoring earns fastest. Telecom - connectivity-led IoT propositions. FactoryOnline - shop-floor digitisation that IoT data feeds.
Bring one asset class and the decision you wish its data changed. Book a decision session and we will tell you plainly whether that is an IoT build, an integration of systems you already own, or a process fix that has to come first.