SIRI Assessment in Saudi Arabia: implementation and integration, assessed independently. We are not a Certified SIRI Assessor and we do not conduct SIRI assessments. The Smart Industry Readiness Index belongs to INCIT, and an Official SIRI Assessment is conducted by an INCIT Certified SIRI Assessor, whom you engage through INCIT's own assessor directory. What we do is the work on either side of it. Its home category here is manufacturing systems.
Start with what it is, because the name on this page is a framework rather than a piece of software. INCIT publishes that SIRI gives manufacturers a clear, independently verified picture of their Industry 4.0 maturity across 16 dimensions, so leadership can prioritise the investments that actually move the needle, and that those dimensions sit under three layers: process, technology and organisation. So the fit question is not whether it will run in your plant. It is whether an externally scored maturity picture is what your decision actually needs, and whether you are prepared to act on a score you did not choose.
You are about to commit real capital to digital manufacturing and cannot yet say which plant or which dimension should get it first. You need a common language your board, your plant managers and your group function will all accept, and an outside reading carries weight that an internal one does not. Or a customer, a lender or a group parent has asked for an independent maturity benchmark and named this one.
We do not recommend it when you already know what is broken. If the line stops for reasons everyone on it can name, an assessment will hand you a scored version of what you already know and a bill for the privilege; fix the known thing first. We also advise against it when nobody has budgeted for the roadmap, because an assessment that leads to no funded action is an expensive document, and when the real question is which software to buy — that is a selection exercise, not a maturity one. In each case a plain IT strategy review gets you further for less.
From INCIT, and no further. The index scores Industry 4.0 maturity across 16 dimensions grouped under process, technology and organisation, on ascending maturity bands from 0 to 5 that INCIT describes as running from undefined to future-ready. INCIT publishes the engagement as three phases — planning and preparation, an on-site assessment, then debriefing and roadmap implementation — producing what it calls six tangible outputs in one comprehensive report, including a prioritisation step that selects focus dimensions and ties them to cost and KPIs. Crucially, INCIT also publishes who may do this: Certified SIRI Assessors, described as independently certified digital-transformation consultants officially recognised under the SIRI framework, who conduct Official SIRI Assessments. We repeat no claim about INCIT's backing or standing beyond what its own pages state.
The first limitation is the one we have to declare about ourselves. An Official SIRI Assessment can only be conducted by an INCIT Certified SIRI Assessor, and we are not one. If a supplier tells you otherwise about itself, ask to see the certification and check it against INCIT's assessor directory before you sign anything. Second, a score is a snapshot of one site on one set of days; it is evidence for a decision, not the decision. Third, the index measures maturity, not profitability — a higher band is not automatically worth buying, and the roadmap is where that judgement actually happens. Fourth, the assessment is the cheap part. The transformation it recommends is not, and an organisation that funds the first and not the second ends up with a scored record of standing still.
A maturity score lands on a real plant with real obligations. The improvements a roadmap recommends are usually capital projects, and they are billed and invoiced like any other: VAT is charged at 15%, and the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority's E-Invoicing (Fatoorah) requirements have been in force since Phase 1 on 4 December 2021 and Phase 2 on 1 January 2023. Assessment work is also document-heavy and shop-floor-facing, so the people interviewed need to be able to answer in Arabic and the evidence needs to exist in a form an outside assessor can read. And the gap between a score and a funded programme is where most of these initiatives die, which is a governance problem rather than a technical one. See the manufacturing sector page for how we treat the underlying plant questions.
Nothing is owned here, so there is nothing to own the cost of — and that is worth saying plainly rather than filling the heading with a number. You do not license the index. You pay a Certified SIRI Assessor for an engagement, priced by that assessor, and we publish no figure for it because it is not ours to quote. What you should budget beside it is the internal time to prepare evidence and free up the people who will be interviewed, the travel and disruption of the on-site days, and — by far the largest line — the roadmap itself, which is the actual spend the score exists to direct. Ask any bidder to separate those, and treat a single number covering all of them as a warning.
Three routes. An externally scored index such as this one, when you need comparability and outside authority. An internal maturity review run against your own criteria, when you need speed and candour more than you need a benchmark. Or no assessment at all, going straight to the one improvement everybody already agrees on, when the constraint is obvious and the money is better spent fixing it. The choice depends on whether the obstacle is knowing what to do or getting agreement to do it. Our independent software comparisons cover the tooling decisions that tend to follow a roadmap; the assessment choice itself is a governance question, not a product one.
We start by asking what decision the score is meant to unlock and who has to accept it. If the answer is firm, we help you scope the engagement and prepare for it, and you appoint a Certified SIRI Assessor through INCIT. We take no fee or margin from any assessor, we are not part of INCIT's programme, and we tell you when we think the assessment is not the thing you need.
Preparation is mostly evidence: what your MES, ERP, maintenance and quality systems can actually show about the plant, and where the answer today is a spreadsheet or a person's memory. We inventory that before the assessor arrives, because a dimension scored low purely because nobody could produce the evidence is a wasted finding. Afterwards, the roadmap's integration work is ordinary delivery, and we scope it the way we scope any other.
The people interviewed should know what they will be asked and why, in the language they work in, and should understand that the exercise scores the operation rather than them — which is the single biggest determinant of whether the answers are honest. Afterwards we help your team hold the roadmap to a schedule, because the risk at that point is not technical.
We publish no counters here. What is worth measuring is agreed before the work starts — typically how much of the roadmap is funded within a quarter of the debrief, and whether the dimensions you chose to move actually moved — against your own baseline. A band from another plant tells you nothing about yours, and we will not quote one.
INCIT publishes the engagement as three phases: planning and preparation, the on-site assessment, then debriefing and roadmap implementation. The duration of each is set by the Certified SIRI Assessor you appoint, not by us, so ask them. What we can size is the preparation before it and the delivery after it, and we put those assumptions in writing.
There is no licence price, because there is no licence: you engage an assessor rather than buy a product. Across three years the real cost is the assessment engagement, your own preparation and participation time, any re-assessment you choose, and the roadmap programme, which will dwarf the rest. We model those with your numbers and publish no benchmark.
We make no compliance claim on anyone's behalf, and we note that an earlier version of this page carried the word "compliance" beside this product without one. What we do is establish where assessment evidence and results are held, obtain the assessor's and INCIT's own written statements for your compliance function, and confirm that the capital work a roadmap triggers is invoiced against ZATCA's published requirements. Any regulatory approval remains yours to hold, not ours or an assessor's to assert.
An externally scored index, an internal maturity review against your own criteria, and doing no assessment and funding the known fix instead. Each is recorded in our report with the reason it was kept or dropped, including the cases where our recommendation is to skip the assessment entirely.
The assessment does not integrate with anything — it reads your operation and scores it, and it replaces no system. The integration question belongs to the roadmap that follows, and it is answered there, per initiative, on evidence.
Not because we perform it, because we do not. Large manufacturers come to us to decide whether the assessment is worth doing, to arrive at it prepared enough that the score reflects the plant rather than the paperwork, and to deliver the roadmap afterwards with someone who has no interest in the score being flattering. We publish no client counts and no win rates.
We name organizations only with their consent and in direct conversation, never on a product page. Ask for references among manufacturers of your size and we will arrange the calls.
No composite case study appears here, and on this page a vague one would be worse than useless: work described loosely enough could be mistaken for conducting the assessment itself. Relevant work is walked through attributably, and precisely, in a first conversation.
We publish no testimonial quotes on this page. Speak to our references directly; it carries more weight than a curated pull-quote.
We hold none, and on this page that sentence is the most important one we can write. TrustAngle is not an INCIT Certified SIRI Assessor, is not an approved SIRI training organisation, holds no accreditation from INCIT, and is not an official SIRI partner in any form. INCIT publishes that Official SIRI Assessments are conducted by its Certified SIRI Assessors and maintains a directory so you can find and verify one; use it, and apply the same test to every firm that offers you this service, including anyone who cites this page. What qualifies our advice is not a badge but its independence: we earn nothing from the assessment, we are not competing to conduct it, and we will tell you when you should not buy it.
Continue with its home category, manufacturing systems, our independent software comparisons, the manufacturing sector page, or an IT strategy review.
Bring us the decision you are trying to make and the evidence your plant can produce today. You will leave with a written position on whether a SIRI assessment is worth commissioning, what to do before one, and what the roadmap after it would have to fund. Request a demo or book an IT strategy review.
Unlimited support included.
One-on-one onboarding sessions.
Training videos, webinars, & demos.